By Dr. Faisal Javaid
The proposed Pakistan-Russia freight train is more than a railway project. It is a test of whether Pakistan can convert its geography into strategic and economic advantage at a time when the map of Eurasian trade is being reshaped by geopolitical uncertainty.
Russia is looking south. Pakistan should be ready.
The latest developments suggest that the initiative is moving from diplomatic commitment towards practical testing. On August 11, Russia’s Ministry of Transport confirmed that Russian and Pakistani railway administrations had established the framework for a test cargo shipment through the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC). The two sides are working out the route, cargo types, tariffs and delivery times, with the date of the test shipment to be coordinated with Pakistan and the transit countries.
Russian Ambassador to Pakistan Albert P. Khorev has provided corresponding details, stating that Russia and Pakistan are preparing freight services connecting Moscow with Karachi and Faisalabad in both directions, with Belarusian participation also under consideration. The two statements concern the same evolving freight initiative and indicate that the project has entered a more practical stage.
This development, however, needs to be viewed in the context of a longer process.
Pakistan and Russia signed a Memorandum of Understanding on railway cooperation at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum in June 2024.
On 18 September 2024, Pakistan joined the proposed Belarus–Russia–Kazakhstan–Uzbekistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–Indian Ocean multimodal transport corridor, giving the bilateral railway initiative a wider regional dimension.
The project then encountered the realities of geopolitics.
The first trial was scheduled for March 15, 2025, and was subsequently pushed towards April. A second launch was planned for June 22, when Pakistan Railways prepared the first 16-wagon freight train. That attempt was also postponed after the escalation of the Iran-Israel conflict disrupted the regional transit environment and the Iran-Pakistan border crossing.
These delays should not be interpreted simply as a failure of political commitment. They exposed a more fundamental problem: a transport corridor crossing several countries remains vulnerable to political and security developments anywhere along its route.
That is precisely why the current test shipment matters. The question is no longer whether Islamabad and Moscow support the idea. The question is whether the route can work commercially.
The forthcoming test should therefore be judged by practical indicators: transit time, freight cost, customs procedures, border delays, insurance requirements and the availability of sufficient two-way cargo. A successful pilot should provide the basis for a regular freight service rather than another cycle of announcements and postponements.
But the strategic significance of the project extends well beyond bilateral trade.
Russia’s interest in southern connectivity is growing as established routes face greater geopolitical uncertainty. The Black Sea has become more exposed to the consequences of the Russia-Ukraine war, while instability surrounding Iran has highlighted the vulnerability of the Strait of Hormuz.
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Marat Khusnullin has argued that railway access to the Indian Ocean should be explored because of risks associated with the Bosphorus and Strait of Hormuz.
For Pakistan, this creates an important strategic opening.
Its principal advantage is geography. Karachi, Port Qasim and Gwadar give Pakistan access to the Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean, potentially connecting Eurasian land routes with maritime markets in South Asia, the Middle East and beyond.
Pakistan should not, however, present itself as a completely risk-free alternative. The stronger proposition is that it can provide another route.
In an increasingly uncertain geopolitical environment, diversification itself has strategic value.
Iran is likely to remain important because it provides the most immediate connection between Pakistan and the wider INSTC. Pakistan should therefore continue improving the Taftan-Zahedan railway connection and ML-3.
At the same time, the experience of 2025 demonstrates why Pakistan should not become dependent on a single transit route. A disruption in one country should not bring the entire connectivity strategy to a halt.
This is where China and the wider Central Asian connectivity architecture become important. Pakistan should examine how Russian and Central Asian cargo could connect through China and eventually reach Pakistani ports. The Quadrilateral Traffic in Transit Agreement, involving Pakistan, China, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, also deserves greater attention as a framework for expanding Central Asian access to Pakistan.
Afghanistan presents a different opportunity.
Its geographical position makes it potentially valuable for connecting Central Asia with Pakistani ports. But there is a crucial distinction between a proposed corridor and an operational one.
There is currently no operational railway connecting Central Asia through Afghanistan to Pakistan. The Trans-Afghan railway therefore remains a future project.
Its eventual construction could significantly alter the regional transport map. But its success will depend on more than engineering.
Pakistan’s continuing security concerns regarding Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and cross-border militancy remain a major obstacle to reliable connectivity through Afghanistan. A railway cannot become a dependable commercial corridor if the political and security environment along its route remains unpredictable.
Russia can potentially contribute to this process through the Moscow Format on Afghanistan. Pakistan should encourage Moscow to give greater attention to the security conditions required for regional connectivity and to the principle that Afghan territory should not be used for militant activity against neighbouring states.
This is not simply a security issue. It is an economic one.
If Afghanistan is eventually integrated into regional transport networks, security along the route will become part of the cost and reliability equation for every investor and logistics operator.
Pakistan should therefore pursue its Eurasian strategy without waiting for a single route to become perfect.
The most sensible approach is a multi-corridor strategy: the INSTC through Iran as the immediate option; China-based connectivity as an alternative; QTTA-related routes as a mechanism for deeper Central Asian integration; and the Trans-Afghan railway as a longer-term possibility.
The objective should not be to choose one corridor over another.
It should be to ensure that Pakistan has more than one route to Eurasia and that Eurasia has more than one route to Pakistan.
This requires a shift in how Islamabad approaches connectivity.
For years, regional connectivity has been discussed through MoUs, ministerial meetings, feasibility studies and corridor maps. These are necessary steps, but they do not create functioning trade routes.
The next phase must be measured differently.
How many trains actually run? How much cargo do they carry? How competitive are freight rates? How quickly can borders be crossed? How predictable are customs procedures? And can private companies make the routes commercially sustainable?
These are the indicators that will determine whether Pakistan becomes a genuine transit state or remains a country of unrealised connectivity potential.
Pakistan’s ports will also be critical. Karachi, Port Qasim and Gwadar should not be treated as separate maritime projects. They should be integrated into a broader Eurasian logistics strategy capable of connecting landlocked Central Asian economies and Russia with the Indian Ocean.
This is where the real opportunity lies.
The Russia-Pakistan freight train may carry only a limited amount of cargo when it eventually runs. But its strategic significance could be much greater than its initial commercial value.
It could provide the starting point for a broader network linking Russia and Central Asia with Pakistan through several routes and, ultimately, with the Indian Ocean.
Pakistan has spent years being described as a country located at the crossroads of regions.
The challenge now is to turn that description into reality.
The objective should not be simply to have a railway from Moscow to Karachi or Faisalabad.
It should be to build a resilient Eurasian–Indian Ocean connectivity network in which Pakistan is an active gateway rather than merely a destination.
Russia is looking for diversified southern access. Central Asian states need reliable routes to the sea. Pakistan possesses the geography and ports to connect these interests.
The opportunity is therefore beyond the freight train.
The first train will test the route.
The real challenge is whether Pakistan can build the infrastructure, commercial systems and regional partnerships that allow the next hundred trains to follow.
Dr. Faisal Javaid is affiliated with the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science & Technology (FUUAST), Islamabad.
About The Author
